Enter a target composite (V + Q sum) between 260 and 340.
No saved attempts yet. Fill all required sections and click Save attempt to log a score.
| # | Date | V | Q | AWA | Composite | Band | Remove |
|---|
How GRE Scoring Works: Adaptive Sections and Raw-to-Scaled
The GRE General Test reports three score numbers: a Verbal Reasoning scaled score (130 to 170), a Quantitative Reasoning scaled score (130 to 170), and an Analytical Writing score (0 to 6). The combined Verbal plus Quantitative composite (260 to 340) is the headline number admissions committees compare. AWA is reported separately and never folded into the composite. Scoring runs through three stages: raw count, scaled equating, percentile mapping.
Approx scaled = round((40 / 27) times raw correct + 130 + adaptive bonus)
The adaptive bonus encodes which Section 2 difficulty track your Section 1 performance triggered. The GRE is section-adaptive, not question-adaptive: every test-taker sees the same Section 1 questions in mixed difficulty, and the computer evaluates your Section 1 raw score before routing Section 2 to one of three tracks. Easy track caps the scaled-score ceiling at roughly 152. Medium track caps at 163. Hard track is the only path to scaled scores between 164 and 170. The published trigger thresholds (sourced from ETS via test-prep providers, since ETS does not publish them directly) put Section 1 raw 0 to 5 on the easy track, 6 to 9 on medium, and 10 to 12 on hard.
Each scaled score then maps to a percentile rank using ETS's most recent rolling three-year cohort. Both the raw-to-scaled and the percentile mapping use proprietary item-response theory adjustments that ETS keeps confidential to prevent test gaming. This calculator uses published approximations that fall within the test's standard error of measurement: about 5 points per section and 7 points on the V plus Q composite. For an authoritative reference, ETS publishes the official scoring methodology at ets.org/gre/test-takers/general-test/scores/understand-scores.
GRE Score Range, Composite, and Percentiles
The table below maps composite and section scaled scores to percentile ranks using the most recent ETS published cohort (2024-2025 reference window). Use it alongside the calculator above to interpret your section results and identify program-fit thresholds.
| Composite (V+Q) | Verbal scaled | Quant scaled | Composite percentile | Score band | Graduate admissions context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 340 | 170 | 170 | 99th | Elite | Maximum possible composite (extremely rare) |
| 335 | 168 | 167 | 98th | Elite | Stanford, MIT, top-5 PhD admit range |
| 330 | 165 | 165 | 96th | Elite | Top business school MBA range (Wharton, HBS, Booth) |
| 325 | 163 | 162 | 92nd | Elite | Top 10 graduate program working baseline |
| 320 | 160 | 160 | 85th | Strong | Top 20 floor; competitive at most disciplines |
| 315 | 158 | 157 | 74th | Strong | Top 30 working target |
| 310 | 155 | 155 | 60th | Above average | Top 50 working target |
| 305 | 153 | 152 | 50th | Above average | Median composite; floor for many top programs |
| 300 | 150 | 150 | 40th | Average | Solid for many regional and mid-tier programs |
| 295 | 148 | 147 | 28th | Average | Workable at less selective programs |
| 290 | 146 | 144 | 17th | Developing | Below typical admit cutoff for top 100 programs |
| 280 | 142 | 138 | 5th | Developing | Significant improvement needed before applying |
| 260 | 130 | 130 | Below 1st | Developing | Minimum possible composite |
Section scaled scores in the same row sum to roughly the listed composite but do not match exactly because the V and Q distributions are asymmetric. Percentile ranks update annually using ETS's rolling three-year cohort. Verify current percentiles at ets.org.
Verbal vs Quant Percentile Asymmetry
The same scaled score yields different percentiles between Verbal and Quantitative. A 155 places you at the 67th percentile on Verbal but only the 39th on Quant. A 165 is the 95th percentile on Verbal but the 82nd on Quant. The reason is structural: the Quantitative distribution has a steeper upper tail because more test-takers score high on Quant (the section contains more pattern-recognition and arithmetic, which is more learnable than reading comprehension and vocabulary), while Verbal has a flatter upper tail because high Verbal scores require strong English reading and vocabulary that is less responsive to short-term prep. When admissions committees evaluate your application, they typically look at your section percentile rather than your raw scaled score. A 155 V is competitive at most humanities and social science programs (67th percentile), while a 155 Q is below the median for STEM programs (39th percentile).
GRE Analytical Writing (AWA) Scoring 0 to 6
The Analytical Writing measure is scored separately on a 0 to 6 single-score rubric in 0.5-point increments. After the September 2023 redesign, you write one Issue task essay (the older Argument task was retired). Each essay is read by a trained human scorer using ETS's published 6-point rubric and is also evaluated by the e-rater computer scoring engine. If the human and e-rater scores agree within 1 point, they are averaged. If they diverge, a second human reads the essay and the score is the average of the two human readers.
AWA is NEVER averaged into the V plus Q composite. Schools see AWA as a separate third number alongside your scaled section scores. Mean AWA in the most recent reporting cohort was approximately 3.5. A 4.5 places you at the 78th percentile, a 5.0 at the 91st percentile, and a 6.0 at the 99th percentile. Below 3.5 raises questions for admissions committees about your written communication; below 3.0 starts to compete against your application narrative even when V and Q are strong. Most graduate programs publish a minimum AWA expectation in the 3.5 to 4.0 range; competitive humanities and law-adjacent programs expect 4.5 or higher.
What Is a Good GRE Score? Benchmarks by Field and Program
A good GRE score depends on your discipline, program tier, and how the rest of your application reads. Three benchmark frameworks give a practical baseline.
Top Program Targets: Engineering, CS, and STEM
Top engineering and computer science programs (MIT, Stanford, Caltech, Berkeley, Carnegie Mellon, Georgia Tech) publish admit profiles with median Quantitative around 167 (88th percentile) and median Verbal around 159 (81st percentile). The composite median for incoming PhD cohorts at top-5 STEM programs is roughly 326. A working target for STEM applicants is Quant 165 or higher with Verbal 160 or higher, total composite 325 or higher. Quant is the binding constraint: most top-program rejections at this tier carry adequate Verbal but Quant below 165. Use the calculator above to compute your undergraduate GPA alongside your GRE composite for the full quant of your application strength.
Top Program Targets: Humanities and Social Sciences
Top humanities and social science programs (Harvard English, Yale History, Princeton Anthropology, Stanford Sociology) weight Verbal more heavily. Median Verbal in admitted PhD cohorts at top-5 humanities programs is approximately 162 (89th percentile), with median Quant around 156 (45th percentile). The composite median is roughly 318, lower than STEM medians because Quant pulls down the total. A working target for humanities applicants is Verbal 162 or higher with Quant 155 or higher, total composite 317 or higher. Verbal is the binding constraint at this tier; Quant 155 is sufficient when Verbal is strong, but Verbal below 158 starts to disadvantage your application even when Quant is strong.
Top Program Targets: MBA Programs Accepting GRE
Most full-time MBA programs accept GRE in lieu of GMAT, and the GRE has gained share among MBA applicants since 2020. M7 schools (Stanford GSB, Wharton, HBS, Booth, Kellogg, Columbia, MIT Sloan) publish GRE-specific admit profiles with median V plus Q around 326 (Verbal 162 plus Quant 164), roughly equivalent to GMAT 700 legacy or 685 Focus. A working target for M7 applications is composite 325 or higher, with both sections at 160 or higher. Top 20 MBA programs cluster around composite 320 medians (V 160 plus Q 160). For applicants comparing tests, our GMAT score calculator shows the cross-test concordance directly.
Can You Use a Calculator on the GRE? What ETS Provides
Yes, you get a calculator on the GRE Quantitative Reasoning section. ETS provides an on-screen four-function calculator built into the test interface; you cannot bring your own calculator to the test center or use a hand-held device during your at-home administration. The calculator is available only on the Quant section, where arithmetic is occasionally needed; it is not provided on Verbal Reasoning or Analytical Writing because those sections do not require numerical computation.
The on-screen calculator includes:
- Standard four operations (plus, minus, times, divide)
- Square root
- Parentheses for order of operations
- Decimal points and sign toggle (plus or minus)
- Memory functions (M+, M-, MR, MC)
- Transfer-display feature that pastes the calculator result into the answer box for numeric-entry questions
The calculator does NOT include exponents (other than squaring via multiplication), logarithms, trigonometry, scientific notation, fractions as a single button, or graphing. Most GRE Quant questions are designed to be solved without the calculator, using estimation, mental math, simplification, and number sense. The calculator is a backup for a small subset of questions where the test writers expect arithmetic might consume time, not a primary problem-solving tool. Test-takers who lean on the calculator for every question typically run out of time, since clicking through the on-screen interface is slower than mental math or scratch work.
Practice with the on-screen interface before test day on official ETS PowerPrep practice tests. The interface differs from a physical calculator (mouse-driven instead of finger-driven, fixed display position on screen, slightly different button layout), and unfamiliarity costs you 30 to 60 seconds per use. ETS publishes detailed calculator documentation in the Test-Taker handbook on ets.org practice tests.
How to Improve Your GRE Score
The most effective improvement strategy depends on which section you are trying to push. The path differs significantly between Verbal and Quant.
For Quantitative, the highest-impact prep is volume of practice problems with accuracy review. Most score gains between 145 and 160 come from learning to recognize question patterns: data interpretation, quantitative comparison, problem-solving with hidden constraints. Above 160, gains come from time management on the harder Section 2 questions and from correcting careless arithmetic. The official ETS PowerPrep practice tests are the most accurate predictor of your real Quant score; third-party tests vary in quality, with our MCAT score calculator peer test sharing similar prep platforms. Plan 80 to 120 hours of focused Quant prep to move from a 150 to a 160; reaching 165 typically requires another 60 to 80 hours.
For Verbal, vocabulary depth is the binding constraint at the high end. The reading comprehension and sentence equivalence question types depend on knowing the precise meanings of academic vocabulary words; the test reuses a relatively stable list of roughly 1,000 high-frequency words across forms. Memorizing this list using spaced-repetition flashcards (Anki, Magoosh, Quizlet) is the highest-impact Verbal prep. Reading comprehension speed is the second binding constraint; reading literary fiction or academic non-fiction at 250 to 300 words per minute helps you finish Section 2 questions on time. Plan 60 to 100 hours of Verbal prep to move from 150 to 160; the move from 160 to 165 requires another 40 to 60 hours, primarily on vocabulary acquisition.
AWA improvement is the cheapest gain per hour of prep among the three sections. The 0 to 6 rubric rewards clear thesis statements, structured paragraphs (typically 4 to 5 paragraphs in a 30-minute window), and varied sentence structure. Most candidates who score below 4.5 on practice essays can reach 4.5 with 6 to 10 hours of focused practice using the official ETS Issue task pool, since the rubric is specific and replicable. For an extended discussion of how the GRE compares with peer admissions tests, see our GMAT score calculator and the cross-test concordance below your score on this page.